Chemistry in the News

While we’re taking a short break (tl;dr there’s a lot of stuff cooking behind the scenes – I’ll talk about it shortly), my news feeds are going berserk with chemistry news here’s the highlights:

BP is dumping chemicals in the gulf designed to break up the oil spill, but there are questions about efficacy and how carefully they have been tested.  Does this mean that the Gulf of Mexico is now the world’s largest beaker?

Meanwhile, research is showing that chemicals in bananas may be effective against HIV?  Take all medical research with a grain of salt, kids.

And on the battlefield, chemistry is making MREs tastier.  I suppose that since MREs are a stew of chemistry already, adding more can’t hurt.

Share

Radio Interview with ITFreely: Eating the Elephant

Sacha

Last night, I had the honor of an interview with David Dolphin and Gareth Eason from ITFreely, an Irish radio show on science and technology.  We discussed hackerspaces, my current experiments, and the current state of garage experimentation.

It was a lot of fun, but listening to myself, I really wish I was more erudite and less stuttery – the final question was especially bad on my part – he asked me about the effects of an STM on drug manufacture, and I gave a true, but somewhat lame answer – that an STM really isn’t helpful for making drugs.  Here’s basically what I wish I had said (I came up with this hours later, of course):

The truth is that people like me have much more to fear from society than society has to fear from us basement chemistry tinkerers.

The irrational fear that everyone with a chemistry set is making methamphetamines or bombs has caused a lot of unfounded raids and arrests.  This stifles innovation and experimentation.  Every time I mention that I have a chemistry lab in my house to anyone, that person immediately jokes about drugs or bombs, and that’s a little scary considering my country’s raid first, ask questions later mentality for chemistry.  Hence the tagline I use on my website: Chemistry is Not a Crime.

In my case not only do I not know how to make meth, I honestly have no desire to make pharmaceuticals. Or explosives – both are way too dangerous, not to mention illegal.  Turning $1.50 of household chemicals into $30 worth of nanoparticles sounds more than lucrative enough to me, and it has a much lower legal risk.


IT Freely Season 2, Episode 15: Eating the Elephant

Share