<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing Update: Getting Warmer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemhacker.com/2010/07/testingupdate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemhacker.com/2010/07/testingupdate/</link>
	<description>Chemical projects, culture, news, and supplies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha</title>
		<link>http://www.chemhacker.com/2010/07/testingupdate/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemhacker.com/?p=263#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hi Floris,
Thanks for the suggestion!

My understanding of distributed computing is vague at best.  
However, at first glance, it looks like overkill - my plan is to have an arduino and a few inexpensive microchips handle those tasks.  The arduino is mostly just setting the X and Y coordinates, reading the Z coordinate, and then sending all three back to the computer via USB.  

Basically: the hardware I&#039;m replacing isn&#039;t doing much computation.

Is there something I&#039;m not understanding?  Again, my knowledge of that field is not very deep.

S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Floris,<br />
Thanks for the suggestion!</p>
<p>My understanding of distributed computing is vague at best.<br />
However, at first glance, it looks like overkill &#8211; my plan is to have an arduino and a few inexpensive microchips handle those tasks.  The arduino is mostly just setting the X and Y coordinates, reading the Z coordinate, and then sending all three back to the computer via USB.  </p>
<p>Basically: the hardware I&#8217;m replacing isn&#8217;t doing much computation.</p>
<p>Is there something I&#8217;m not understanding?  Again, my knowledge of that field is not very deep.</p>
<p>S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floris Vermeir</title>
		<link>http://www.chemhacker.com/2010/07/testingupdate/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Floris Vermeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemhacker.com/?p=263#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I was just wondering if open source distributed software couldn&#039;t be used to replace the often expensive support hardaware found on commerical ones. by using the power of mutltiple computers ? it coud be a kind of frameork with digital hardaware wich would allow for multiple open source/hardaware projects...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just wondering if open source distributed software couldn&#8217;t be used to replace the often expensive support hardaware found on commerical ones. by using the power of mutltiple computers ? it coud be a kind of frameork with digital hardaware wich would allow for multiple open source/hardaware projects&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

