The first response most people have when I tell them I have a home chemistry lab is either “why do you have a meth lab in your basement?” or “do you make explosives?” The answer to both is “no,” and I’m a bit saddened that this is the first things people think about when they think about chemistry.
I completely understand the fascination – explosions are fun to witness, and the thought of a meth lab in an acquaintance’s basement is titillating.
But here’s something most people don’t realize: in addition to being wildly dangerous (and generally illegal without the proper permissions), they’re really boring from a chemistry standpoint.
Nearly all combustion and explosion reactions are a variant on the following theme:
Fuel + Oxygen + Spark = (lots of) Energy + Byproducts
In addition to being illegal and boring, these are unimaginative fields for a home lab to pursue. Chemistry is a wildly diverse and creative field. To only focus on drugs and explosions is incredibly short-sighted and self-limiting.
This blog purposefully will not spend much time talking about drugs or explosions. Not because they’re not interesting, but because there’s so much more to talk about.
Here is a (very brief) list of things that are interesting and could easily be explored in a home lab:
- Ferrofluid
- Luminol
- Food chemistry/molecular gastronomy
- Metal patinas and finishes
- Electrochemistry – batteries, fuel cells, etc
- Plant extracts
- Polymers (rayon, nylon, etc)
- Nanoparticles (nano gold particles glow purple!)
- Dyes, inks, pigments, paints, and coatings
- Perfumes, scents, etc
- Soap
- Biodiesel
- Water (seriously – water is the wierdest material ever)
- Bucky balls, bucky sheets, bucky tubes (aka carbon nanotubes), etc
Note: Public domain image courtesy of wikipedia.org. Click the image for more details.
Any interest in electroplating?
@Tim: sure, electroplating’s very cool (maybe falls under the electrochemistry or metal patina categories).
@ John: yeah, that’s something else I’m not terribly interested in working with…
I think we talk about that stuff ’cause explosions and sparklers were cool to make with our jr. high chem sets. It is time to move past that, I suppose. I’m so-so on the blog theme, the logo is cool, and I like your bubbly line divider at the end of the post.
Best to ya
Um, I’m a little disappointed not to see your response to this on Buzz:
http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2010/02/23/things_i_wont_work_with_dioxygen_difluoride.php
‘The sodium chemistry remains unexplored.’ Muhuhuhuhahahahhahahaaahaaaaaaa…. C’mon, Sacha, let’s get our mad science on! What’s a little FOOF between friends?