Things we won’t be talking much about

Public domain image courtesy of wikipedia.orgThe first response most people have when I tell them I have a home chemistry lab is either “why do you have a meth lab in your basement?” or “do you make explosives?”  The answer to both is “no,” and I’m a bit saddened that this is the first things people think about when they think about chemistry.

I completely understand the fascination – explosions are fun to witness, and the thought of a meth lab in an acquaintance’s basement is titillating.

But here’s something most people don’t realize: in addition to being wildly dangerous (and generally illegal without the proper permissions), they’re really boring from a chemistry standpoint.

Nearly all combustion and explosion reactions are a variant on the following theme:

Fuel + Oxygen + Spark = (lots of) Energy + Byproducts

In addition to being illegal and boring, these are unimaginative fields for a home lab to pursue.  Chemistry is a wildly diverse and creative field.  To only focus on drugs and explosions is incredibly short-sighted and self-limiting.

This blog purposefully will not spend much time talking about drugs or explosions.  Not because they’re not interesting, but because there’s so much more to talk about.

Here is a (very brief) list of things that are interesting and could easily be explored in a home lab:

Note: Public domain image courtesy of wikipedia.org. Click the image for more details.

Share

4 Responses to “Things we won’t be talking much about”

  1. Tim says:

    Any interest in electroplating?

    • Sacha says:

      @Tim: sure, electroplating’s very cool (maybe falls under the electrochemistry or metal patina categories).

      @ John: yeah, that’s something else I’m not terribly interested in working with…

  2. allan says:

    I think we talk about that stuff ’cause explosions and sparklers were cool to make with our jr. high chem sets. It is time to move past that, I suppose. I’m so-so on the blog theme, the logo is cool, and I like your bubbly line divider at the end of the post.

    Best to ya

  3. John Stoner says:

    Um, I’m a little disappointed not to see your response to this on Buzz:

    http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2010/02/23/things_i_wont_work_with_dioxygen_difluoride.php

    ‘The sodium chemistry remains unexplored.’ Muhuhuhuhahahahhahahaaahaaaaaaa…. C’mon, Sacha, let’s get our mad science on! What’s a little FOOF between friends?